Search for: "May v. Supreme Court of State of Colorado" Results 81 - 100 of 1,942
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 Trump himself made this Positions Clause argument before the Colorado Supreme Court, and he even prevailed on it in the Colorado district court. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm by Amy Howe
Both Trump and the Colorado Republican Party came to the Supreme Court, asking the justices to review the state supreme court’s ruling. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 8:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Colorado Also is Not (Yet) Exercising Its Authority Under Article I's "Electors" Clause One of Trump's arguments (see Part V of his brief) is that the Colorado Supreme Court violated the Electors Clause of the U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:30 am by Will Baude
But the occasion of the Colorado Supreme Court's decision in Anderson v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 5:45 pm by Ilya Somin
I have written about other issues related to the Section 3 litigation in a variety of writings, most extensively here and here.The post My Supreme Court Amicus Brief in Trump v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:10 am by Marty Lederman
  And I certainly agree that if a majority of Justices concludes that Trump is in fact disqualified and that the Colorado Supreme Court did not otherwise err in holding that his name should be removed from the Colorado ballot, that is what they ought to hold; I’m not suggesting that the Court disregard the law if it clearly demands affirmance. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 6:26 am by Marty Lederman
A week from Thursday, on February 8, the Supreme Court will hear argument in No. 23-179, Trump v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Dean Falvy
Anderson, the Court has agreed to hear an appeal from the Colorado Supreme Court’s bombshell December 19, 2023 ruling in Anderson v. [read post]
The problem is that they frequently don’t have the money to upgrade their infrastructure and they may only have one or two people on their staff, and those people might not have a lot of expertise, so trying to meet the Safe Drinking Water Act, that’s challenging for them. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 7:43 am by Amy Howe
With his execution scheduled for May 18, 2023, Glossip came to the Supreme Court, asking the justices – with Drummond’s support – to put his execution on hold to give them more time to consider his appeals. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by SHG
They challenged that punishment in the Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 8:53 am by Eugene Volokh
In saying this, we acknowledge that if the Court were to affirm the Colorado Supreme Court's decision that Mr. [read post]