Search for: "Mayes v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 93
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Kristin Mayes/Hazelrigg, was initiated in 1971, two years before the US Supreme Court determined abortion access was a constitutional right in Roe v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
The Court concluded there were extensive human rights violations and ordered the State to provide specialized medical assistance to the victims, pay compensation for both material losses and pain and suffering, and publicly acknowledge its wrongdoing. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 State of New York v Vayu, Inc., 39 NY3d 330, 332-335 [2023]). [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 10:32 am by Sophia Cope
  We are happy to report that the court in the case, Arizona Broadcasters Association v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:24 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
    Precedent from the Supreme Court of Florida in Levin, Middlebrooks, Mabie, Thomas, Mayes & Mitchell, P.A. v. [read post]
Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs announced an executive order on Friday that protects abortion rights within the state one year after the Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 8:28 am by Russell Knight
When a divorce begins, it feels like you didn’t know your spouse at all. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by Scott Harshbarger and Dennis Aftergut
Mayes’ predecessor, Republican Mark Brnovich, was the lead petitioner in Brnovich v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm by Taylor Ross
In a paper for the Fordham Urban Law Journal, she explains that two hundred families across several states have signed onto a class action complaint, J.T. v. [read post]
14 May 2022, 6:30 am by Mark S. Humphreys
  Todd follows an earlier seminal case regarding alleged misrepresentations in a life insurance application, Mayes v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am by Eugene Volokh
Nov. 24, 2015) (dictum) (taking the view that an anti-libel injunction would be a permissible injunction against "unprotected speech," and thus consistent with the First Amendment); Maye v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
Nov. 24, 2015) (dictum) (taking the view that an anti-libel injunction would be a permissible injunction against "unprotected speech," and thus consistent with the First Amendment); Maye v. [read post]