Search for: "Mays v. People"
Results 21 - 40
of 43,637
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2023, 3:30 am
The Gun Violence Archive reports that between January 1, 2023, and May 1, 2023 there have been 185 mass shootings that injured 744 people and killed 252 people.1 In 2008, the United States Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess firearms, separate and apart from militia service in Heller v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 2:12 pm
And while some of these people may commit crimes for which they will spend the rest of their lives in prison, most of them will not. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
In People v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 2:05 pm
At which point you may feel compelled to deliberately kill the remaining witness, as you're already guilty of felony murder. [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:36 pm
It may not make rational sense, but people aren't uniformly rational animals.Case in point. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 6:09 pm
On the ethics front is the possibility that the alleged victim may be paid to go away. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:34 pm
You may well like animals. [read post]
5 May 2016, 11:16 am
A sense that's only highlighted by the fact that this case is entitled People v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 9:29 am
Justice Baxters says this appeal "may not be the last," but I can add to that: It definitely won't be the last.It's a death penalty case. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 4:08 am
In Martin v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 2:25 pm
The first of May brings us precisely such a case.The case concerns a man named Charles Brady, who lives on the streets of my very own San Diego. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 11:04 am
I realize I never posted anything about the California Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in People v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 1:13 pm
Or that people seem to buy it.Of course, there are real victims as well, so at the same time, it's incredibly sad.It's a set of facts I wouldn't believe if someone pitched 'em to me. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:33 pm
The court may also consider "reliable hearsay," including the case summary prepared by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders (People v Hucks, 72 A.D.3d 1608, 1609, lv denied 15 N.Y.3d 706; see People v Cunning . . [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 10:19 am
(People v Kozlowski, 11 NY3d 223 [2008]). [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:00 pm
May's sentence? [read post]
10 May 2013, 12:42 pm
It may well be -- as the Court of Appeal holds -- that a criminal court doesn't have the statutory power to enter a restraining order in an extortion case, unlike some other criminal cases (e.g., stalking, domestic violence, etc.).However, if that's indeed the case, the law should be changed.Defendant tries to extort a job from someone by threatening him. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 9:08 am
–People v. [read post]
