Search for: "Mays v. People"
Results 41 - 60
of 43,680
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2018, 1:20 pm
In People v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 7:23 am
Whitepages The post Another Tough Ruling for People Search Databases–Camacho v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
Yikes.Thankfully, Phillong Huynh will be in prison for the rest of his life.But there are presumably more people like him out there.The lesson of this case (amongst others) is to NOT go to bars with strange people who strike up a conversation with you and offer to pay for your drinks, etc. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 12:02 pm
However, that is exactly what happened in People v Francis. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:41 pm
" Seems like I'm guilty of pandering in that situation as well given Justice Kriegler's holding in this case, which concludes that even trying (as here) to convince an existing prostitute counts as pandering; e.g., as precedent reflects, that a "substantial potential for social harm is revealed even by the act of encouraging an established prostitute to alter her business relations.This may be another one of those areas where we deliberately pass statutes that are… [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 5:25 pm
2018 NY Slip 00005 By order of the Supreme Court on May 13, 2016, which heard a case against the defendant who is a level 1 sex offender. [read post]
12 May 2020, 2:50 pm
., to defraud people. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 8:15 pm
Columnist George Will cites the Cato Institute amicus brief in Harris v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 1:53 pm
The appellate court in People v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 3:08 pm
" (Or, to put it a slightly different way -- and in support of a different conclusion -- whether "a mental health expert may [] give testimony that the defendant did or did not form the mental state required for the crime charged. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:32 pm
In People v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 10:00 pm
Reiner confirms that the Fifth Amendment right to remain silent in court may even be exercised by people maintaining their inncocence. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 12:39 pm
People v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:07 pm
All we want to let the jury know is that the defendant has previously been convicted and that our judgment is that people with those priors may tend to perjure themselves as well -- or that a jury could at least reasonably take that into account. [read post]
3 May 2019, 1:25 pm
Seems to me like she was just speaking loosely.Like normal people often do. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:23 pm
The Court, interpreting People v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 12:46 pm
See which one you find more persuasive.I'm generally not into people touching my junk. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 9:09 am
April 16, 2020) The post Section 230 Doesn’t Protect Advertising “Background Reports” on People–Lukis v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 11:50 am
People use those words just in case their cell phones are intercepted or they're subject to a tap. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 2:08 pm
In People v Shapard (2009 NY Slip Op 00903 [4th Dept 2/6/09]) the Court held that a defendant may not waive his right to a presentence report prior to the imposition of a sentence of imprisonment.We agree with defendant that his waiver of the presentence report should not have been given effect pursuant to CPL 390.20 (4) (a). [read post]
