Search for: "Mays v. Shields" Results 1 - 20 of 4,510
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2017, 2:18 am by Joe Rosenbaum
  The post First Joint Consultations May Foreshadow Effectiveness of Privacy Shield appeared first on Legal Bytes. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:02 am by Colin Miller
Let’s take a look at the recent opinion of the Sixth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 5:00 am
Jonathan Ellis and Gregory DuBoff of the McGuire Woods firm have filed an excellent cert petition in Shields v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 8:27 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Such land is held in trust by the government, but may be leased by allottees. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 4:34 pm by Dwight Sullivan
There were two issues in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 6:12 am by Gemma Nash
The annual review may also consider whether additional rules on “automated decision-making,” which are not currently regulated by Privacy Shield, should be added. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 10:29 am by Andres
I do not know what may be the result, but let’s just bask in the fact that data protection authorities will now be Agents of Shield. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 5:00 am by Nicolas P. Terry
However, there may have been other political forces at work as liability shields were speedily passed by state legislatures. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 10:05 am
Image via WikipediaHawaii's year-old shield law [Hawaii Rev. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 pm by rtruman
Supreme Court, 8-1, Rules Debtors May Not Shield Auto Payments When None Due :: Ransom v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 4:08 pm by Kantor & Kantor LLP
If you are a member of this class you may submit or resubmit to Blue Shield any claims you may have for reimbursement for residential treatment that you received while a Blue Shield member between September 2, 2007 and December 31, 2015 for anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa if Blue Shield denied authorization or reimbursement on the grounds that your plan did not provide coverage for residential treatment. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 12:45 pm
Peter Schjeldahl's review of the Richard Prince retrospective now up at the Guggenheim refers to Prince's "1983 photograph of an infamous Garry Gross photograph ... of a naked Brooke Shields, aged ten, her prepubescent body oiled and her face given womanly makeup," and says Prince "enjoyed the spectacle of Shields's failed later effort, in a lawsuit, to quash Gross's picture, which her mother had authorized for four hundred and fifty dollars. [read post]