Search for: "Mays v. Social Security Administration" Results 81 - 100 of 2,509
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2014, 12:52 pm by Ted Smith
Once that diagnostic criterion has been met, the Social Security Administration does allow for the possibility that migraines may be found to be “medically equivalent” to Listing 11.03. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 2:50 pm by Matt Pulle
 Courts are mindful that the standards for determining disability under the Social Security requirements may vary considerably from the standards for determining disability under a private ERISA plan. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 9:33 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Colvin, a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, claimant appealed the United States Social Security Administration’s (SSA) denial of his application for disability benefits. [read post]
9 May 2016, 6:57 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  However, what many people may not realize is that once they get approved for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits, they will be subject to a reevaluation, so the United States Social Security Administration (SSA) can verify the claimants are still disabled. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 7:56 am by Ronald Mann
ShareWednesday’s argument in Babcock v Kijakazi will take the justices deep into the intersection of the Social Security Act and a host of statutes defining the obligations and compensation of National Guard workers. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 11:42 am
While former workers can be eligible for both at the same time, the Social Security Administration typically requires in such situations that SSDI benefits be reduced so the total monthly amount a worker takes in is no more than 80 percent of what was earned when he or she was fully employed. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 11:43 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: Appealing for disability benefits brings arduous wait, May 25, 2016, The Herald-Tribune, By Kery Murakami More Blog Entries: Mabry v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 5:33 pm by Ted Smith
In order to expedite the Social Security disability claim, the veteran must tell the Social Security Administration that he/she has a VA disability rating of 100% and show proof of that rating. [read post]
17 May 2016, 5:18 pm by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: It’s time for action on Social Security disability insurance, May 6, 2016, The Hill, By Jim McCrery and Earl Pomeroy More Blog Entries: Dimmett v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 9:51 am by Matthew Smith
Often, individuals whose Social Security Disability benefits case was denied at a hearing with an Administrative Law Judge choose to file a brand new initial claim for benefits. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:44 am
Yet this is the standard that is so often applied by the Social Security Administration and the Administrative Law Judge, who is responsible for reviewing the claim if it's rejected and then appealed. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 1:14 pm
Astrue shows that the Social Security Administration (SSA), agency Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) and appellate courts are expected to follow a strict path in resolving the issue. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 5:33 pm
In order to expedite the Social Security disability claim, the veteran must tell the Social Security Administration that he/she has a VA disability rating of 100% and show proof of that rating. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 7:12 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
As our Boston Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits attorneys can explain, this may offer hope for those in the future if a change is done appropriately, but it will not be of much help to the approximately 10 million disabled Americans who are currently relying on Social Security disability benefits to make ends meet and take care of themselves and their families. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 6:37 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
While you may be asking what the Farm Bill of 2008 has to do with the Social Security disability program, the answer should be nothing. [read post]