Search for: "Mays v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 118,703
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2025, 3:30 am by John Jenkins
As Meredith pointed out in her recent blog on the Executive Order, the SCOTUS held in a New Deal Era case called Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 3:15 am by Sasha Volokh
See Reed, 576 U.S. at 163; AAPC, 591 U.S. at 618 (plurality opinion); United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 9:05 pm by renholding
Musk[3] (striking Elon Musk’s $56 billion pay package at Tesla), West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 12:36 pm by Guest Author
” But the Trump Administration may find that using antitrust to curtail “Big Tech censorship” is complicated. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 12:04 pm by Jesse M. Coleman and Eron Reid
[1] On August 20, 2024, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas in Ryan, LLC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 9:07 am by News Desk
., doing business as L&V Food Supply of Houston, TX, is recalling 1,152 pounds of ineligible peppered frozen, dried Siluriformes fish products that were produced by an establishment in Vietnam that is not eligible to export Siluriformes fish to the United States, according to the U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing  Matter of Sadallah v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 160 AD3d 1482, the Appellate Division found that the ALJ's determination was supported by substantial evidence, observing that "Evidence which would not be admissible in a court, such as hearsay, is admissible in a departmental hearing"* and "if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence". [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing  Matter of Sadallah v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 160 AD3d 1482, the Appellate Division found that the ALJ's determination was supported by substantial evidence, observing that "Evidence which would not be admissible in a court, such as hearsay, is admissible in a departmental hearing"* and "if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence". [read post]