Search for: "Mays v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 127,189
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2022, 6:53 am by Guest Author
In AMG, the Court rejected the FTC’s interpretation of Section 13(b) of the FTC Act, which states that the Commission “may bring suit in a district court of the United States to enjoin” violations of the law that the FTC enforces. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 5:51 am
Until the Supreme Court filed its June 17, 2022 opinion in Borst Brothers Construction, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On July 12, 2019, defendants, on behalf of plaintiffs, commenced a hybrid Article 78  proceeding captioned Ressler v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:43 am by Michael Ehline
Aviators and others say Bell V-280 Valor is safer and long overdue as a replacement. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:18 am by Frank Cranmer
Readers may possibly recall the judgment in In R (Z & Anor) v Hackney London Borough Council & Anor [2020] UKSC 40, which we noted at the time, here. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 11:26 pm by Wallin & Klarich
On the other hand, an attorney may try to eliminate the mens rea of the crime by showing that the actor did not have the necessary culpable state of mind in committing the crime because he was unconscious. [read post]
Our Working Group’s members may write to the Commission separately on whether, as a matter of policy, the proposal should be adopted or modified; those matters are beyond the scope of these comments. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Nabil Shaikh
Richman noted that in Gundy v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The majority opinion’s rationale in In the Matter of Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 1:33 pm by Mark D. Rasch
P. 4 sets out the various ways that process may be served to both in-state residents (Rule 4.2) out of state or international residents (Rule 4.3) or by publication in a newspaper (Rule 4.4). [read post]