Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 119,135
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2008, 1:44 am
R (BAPIO Action Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another [2008] UKHL 27; [2008] WLR (D) 133 “Departmental guidance to NHS trusts which had the effect of preventing trainee doctors from overseas being offered postgraduate training places in NHS hospitals was unlawful. [read post]
1 May 2008, 2:18 am
Regina (BAPIO Action Ltd and Another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another House of Lords “Government guidance to National Health Service employers which had the effect of preventing overseas trainee doctors from being offered postgraduate training places in NHS hospitals was unlawful. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:34 pm
Just a head’s up to all the South Florida criminal defense attorneys who are following the hot topic of the constitutionality of Florida’s drug possession statute, section 893.13: the Florida Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the case of State v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 6:47 am
On May 12, 2021, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in State of Ohio v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Donohue et al v Paterson, USDC, Northern District of New York, 1:10-CV-00543 (LEK/DRH) [Filed May 28,2010] Federal District Court Judge Lawrence E. [read post]
18 May 2007, 1:12 am
However, in a May 15 decision denying State Farm's motion to dismiss in another case, Palmer v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:34 am
Criminal Trial in United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:09 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 8:44 am
” United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2006, 10:04 am
Indeed, such a request will probably be formally addressed to the Secretary of State for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office by Mr Hicks' lawyers, and any refusal on his part may again be reviewed by the courts: see R (Abbasi) v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 6:59 am
State v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 10:27 am
State, this Court held that an item in plain view may only be seized when its evidentiary nature is apparent without any further investigation. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 8:01 am
The post State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 8:01 am
The post State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:03 am
See, e.g., Ray v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 4:30 pm
United States Issue: Whether a person may be criminally prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
Up until this case, that position had support in domestic law (see AL (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 42, [2008] 4 All ER 1127; R (Hooper) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 29, [2006] 1 All ER 487; and R (S) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 39, [2004] 4 All ER 193). [read post]
9 May 2007, 10:21 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
