Search for: "Mays v. State" Results 361 - 380 of 120,044
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm by ngodridge
”[8] CFTC implementing regulation, Regulation 40.11, correspondingly prohibits DCMs from listing any event contract that “involves, relates to, or references terrorism, assassination, war, gaming, or an activity that is unlawful under State or Federal law,” or “an activity that is similar to [the enumerated activities] and that the Commission determines, by rule or regulation, to be contrary to the public interest. [read post]
17 Nov 2024, 6:48 pm by Kurt R. Karst
Those cases evaluate when state and local governments can act in ways that may be different from the federal government. [read post]
16 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm by Ariel Silverbreit
” Lawrence counters, however, that even if functions are expressive in nature, states may have a superseding right to protect their citizens from life-altering addictions. [read post]
15 Nov 2024, 10:42 pm by Bill Marler
 [1] The true number of sick people in this outbreak was likely much higher than the number reported, and the outbreak may not be limited to the states with known illnesses. [read post]
15 Nov 2024, 7:23 pm by Bill Marler
For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[24] Other unusual vehicles for E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks have included unpasteurized juices, yogurt, dried salami, mayonnaise, raw milk, game meats, sprouts, and raw cookie dough.[25] According to a recent study, an estimated 93,094 illnesses are due to domestically acquired E. coli O157:H7 each year in the United… [read post]
15 Nov 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Sure, this guy said he took Xanax, but people say all sorts of things that may or may not be true. [read post]
15 Nov 2024, 11:59 am
However, if the client does not recognize its right to a jury is unwaivable, it may end up abiding by the terms of the agreement and litigating the case in Washington without a jury. [read post]
15 Nov 2024, 4:15 am by SHG
This is, indeed, a serious consideration, and why, contrary to the most hysterical of Trump haters, I agreed with that aspect of the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2024, 3:17 am by Brittany Bromell
Supreme Court decision on substitute analysts, Smith v. [read post]