Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 118,259
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2010, 2:13 am
Regina (MJ (Angola)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 557; [2010] WLR (D) 132 “The Secretary of State’s apparently untrammelled discretion contained in s 42(2) of the Mental Health Act 1983 to discharge a patient detained in hospital under ss 37 and 41 of the Act in order to facilitate his or her deportation on the grounds that he had committed criminal offences was to be exercised rationally and in such a way as would not breach the… [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:42 am
Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 15 May 2012. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 11:17 am
See Crews v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 11:41 am
See State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:24 pm
United States. [read post]
28 May 2014, 12:42 pm
On May 5, 2014, The Supreme Court announced its decision in Robers v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 12:42 pm
On May 5, 2014, The Supreme Court announced its decision in Robers v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:24 pm
United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 2:19 pm
May (The Free State Foundation) has posted Defining Deference Down, Again: Independent Agencies, Chevron Deference, and Fox (Administrative Law Review, Vol. 62, No. 2, p. 433, Spring 2010) on SSRN. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 7:46 am
The post State v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
” The post Williamson City Planning v Hamilton Bank Limited Where Takings Claims May Be Filed appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 8:27 am
Fischer v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 1:44 am
Court of Appeals decision in Odumn v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 11:55 am
Tapia v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 4:18 pm
(quoting State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 10:05 am
United States, __ A.3d __ (D.C. 2014). [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:11 am
Whiting may affect the case, and whether S.B. 1070 is likely to survive the Court’s scrutiny if cert. is granted. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 5:53 am
Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 10:59 am
Here is a recap of May’s filings: Garey, et. al. v. [read post]