Search for: "Mays v. State" Results 401 - 420 of 119,974
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2024, 6:11 am by Timothy Misner
The outcome of this dispute may be dictated by a footnote from Justice Scalia’s opinion in Rockwell Int’l Corp. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
One such potential area of tension includes the requirement for providers to make judgements about the legality of content and the data protection principle of data minimisation, as providers may need more contextual information to reach a conclusion, which may, in turn, breach data protection laws. [read post]
3 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
While some of them may harbor reservations about Trump’s character, they like his policies. [read post]
3 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm by Lesley Wexler
Others may be reluctant to engage the institution that harmed them. [read post]
3 Nov 2024, 11:17 am by Giles Peaker
A note on a couple of Upper Tribunal appeals of FTT determinations of rent – because there may be more of these applications and determinations when the Renters’ Rights Bill comes into force… Kensington Avenue Ltd v Curlin (LANDLORD AND TENANT – RENT DETERMINATION – fair rent – s.70 Rent Act 1977 – sufficiency of reasons for FTT decision on open market rent and comparable properties) (2024) UKUT 341 (LC) This was a fair rent determination… [read post]
3 Nov 2024, 1:15 am by Frank Cranmer
Cathérine Van de Graaf, Eva Brems and Stéphanie Hennette-Vauchez, Strasbourg Observers: Third party intervention to the ECtHR in F.D. and I.M. and three others (Les Hijabeuses) v France. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
Tennessee followed suit with its own capital rape law in May 2024, and six other states have considered similar expansions to the scope of the death penalty in the past year. [read post]
  Of course, the EPO’s legal division may simply take this decision at face value, delete Chapter H-V 2.7 from the Guidelines (and similar sections elsewhere, e.g. in Chapter F-IV, 4.3 and 4.4) and the other Boards of Appeal may adopt the reasoning of T 56/21. [read post]