Search for: "Mays v. State" Results 501 - 520 of 132,441
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2024, 10:54 am by Amanda Sanders (UK)
It is also important to recognise that although an employee may not work in the UK or within UK waters, if the connection between the UK and the employment relationship is “sufficiently strong” then the courts may have jurisdiction over any claim which may arise. [read post]
The bill states: [Employers] shall not…[v]oluntarily grant recognition rights for the employer’s employees solely and exclusively on the basis of signed labor organization authorization cards if the selection of a bargaining representative may instead be conducted through a secret ballot election. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
It held that platforms’ content-moderation activities are “not speech,” but rather “censorship” that States may freely regulate without implicating the First Amendment. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:02 am by Beatrice Yahia
Sahil Kapur and Frank Thorp V report for NBC News. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 3:19 am by INFORRM
In the NetChoice cases, the court seems ready to limit a state’s ability to directly compel social media platforms to convey messages that they may moderate. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm by Chuck Cosson
However, IP ownership related to AI-generated content under United States law is still in flux. [14] Hogan Lovells goes on to note that, because issues are in flux, the rights enforceable under a contract may not be enforceable against the world, i.e., non-parties to the contract. [read post]