Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 561 - 580
of 129,875
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2012, 7:48 pm
In State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
Fulmer v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 9:26 am
The appellant in United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:08 am
Ball State University. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:08 am
Ball State University. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 11:34 am
State v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 9:17 am
State barred from initiating or enacting legislation authorizing the furloughing of State workersDonohue et al v Paterson, USDC, Northern District of New York, 1:10-CV-00543 (LEK/DRH) [Filed May 28,2010]Federal District Court Judge Lawrence E. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:43 am
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court recently decided State of Maine v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 6:59 pm
Our brief focuses on one question presented: May state regulation totally prohibit the free navigation of federally licensed vessels for five months of the year without violating the Supremacy Clause? [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 9:10 am
State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:58 am
The court of appeals held this week in State v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:10 am
They argued that this was the necessary implication of the finding of the Supreme Court in the case of Munir v Secretary of State [2012] 1 WLR 2192 and Alvi (which were heard together) that the power of the Secretary of State to make or vary the Immigration Rules was wholly statutory and not an exercise of prerogative power: [27]. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 10:44 am
There's this little thing you may well have studied in law school that's spelled S-O-V-E-R-E-I-G-N I-M-M-U-N-I-T-Y. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:56 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
Importantly, after reading the various takes on United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 11:03 am
North Dakota (2016), the United States Supreme Court held that state authorities may subject you to criminal penalties for refusing to take a breathalyzer test if you’ve been arrested for driving under the influence (DUI). [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:30 pm
Check the Dillon v. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 10:56 am
The district court may order the state to present additional portions. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 5:37 am
This year, the Supreme Court of the United States may (or may not) grant a writ to hear a case involving Nazi-era looted art for the first time in almost a decade. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 7:24 am
Thus, Plaintiff may not “avoid the state action question” by claiming that Facebook is serving a public function. [read post]
