Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 581 - 600
of 132,453
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
"Click HERE to access the United States Court of Appeal for the District of Columbia Circuit's decision in United States of America v Donald J. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
"Click HERE to access the United States Court of Appeal for the District of Columbia Circuit's decision in United States of America v Donald J. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:15 am
Our readers know that Delaware forum selection clauses have been enforced by courts in many states since Delaware Chancery’s 2013 decision in Boilermakers v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
In Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 11:00 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
These include the following, among other indicators: (i) the acquirer is “well-capitalized” and the resulting institution will be “well-capitalized”; (ii) the acquirer has a Community Reinvestment Act (the “CRA”) rating of Outstanding or Satisfactory; (iii) the resulting institution will have total assets of less than $50 billion; (iv) the acquirer has composite, management and consumer compliance ratings of 1 or 2; and (v) the acquirer has… [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
But the transparency concerns may not provide an animating justification for [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
(For those curious, Parts V and VI of our ten-part series are mostly done, though they may change depending on what happens in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
And tomorrow, Thursday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:37 pm
Similar to offenders convicted in New York, out-of-state offenders must undergo an assessment process to determine their risk level, which may involve evaluating factors such as the nature of the offense, the offender’s criminal history, and any other relevant circumstances. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:25 pm
See also Baude/Paulsen at pp. 11-16; Cawthorn v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
For example, a state may require that a candidate or a party have made “a showing of a modicum of support among the potential voters for the office,” Munro v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
For example, a state may require that a candidate or a party have made “a showing of a modicum of support among the potential voters for the office,” Munro v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 1:42 pm
” Rhode v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 1:26 pm
Neville v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
Written by Mark V. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 10:05 am
Circuit's conclusion inUnited States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:31 am
Reading all the opinions here, it looks like the state of the law in the Second Circuit on Title IX discrimination is in flux. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:27 am
The existence of negligence may be inferred from circumstantial evidence. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:19 am
We note that in the Trump v. [read post]