Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 601 - 620
of 130,991
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2023, 2:24 pm
That's not clear; compare Cavanaugh v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 12:44 pm
In 2017, in Matal v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
Kivett, and the New York state law in Cantero v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am
”[2] The Government must perform cost analysis analysis when cost or pricing data are required and may perform cost analysis to evaluate information other than cost or pricing data when it is not possible to determine a fair and reasonable price through price analysis alone.[3] Cost analysis is frequently performed, and the Cost Principles frequently apply, in pricing both fixed-price and cost-reimbursement contracts. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:19 am
Casey, generally returning to the individual states the power to regulate abortions. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:12 am
This year, the Supreme Court delivered a major victory for free speech in 303 Creative v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
Protocol I, article 50(3); ICTY Prosecutor v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 7:00 am
In the United States, the Chevron doctrine, even with its subsequent limitations, is rather far reaching. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 5:00 am
Instead, as noted in the case of Fulop v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 5:00 am
Instead, as noted in the case of Fulop v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
That's Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
It implies that in a PCT application where parties A and B are applicants for different designated States, both applicants may rely on the priority right derived from a priority application filed by only one of the applicants without the need for any transfer of priority rights from party A to party B.12. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
As the Court stated: “We have time and again forcefully rejected the notion that government actors may intentionally allocate preferences to those ‘who may have little in common with one another but the color of their skin” (quoting Shaw v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 8:28 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 6:34 pm
Performance data should be customized to the indications for use, including the specific intended patient population (adult vs. pediatric), disease state, conditions of use, and the target anatomical location. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 6:07 pm
Matter of Town of Copake v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm
In Murray v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 3:15 pm
From a memorandum supporting a motion to permanently seal the entire case in Doe v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 2:47 pm
In contrast to the 9th Circuit view, in California state court, such a stay was automatic (CCP 1294 made such orders appealable and CCP 916 allowed for an automatic stay).Earlier this year the federal law changed: Under the Supreme Court's Coinbase v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 2:22 pm
[1] U.S. v. [read post]
