Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 641 - 660
of 133,161
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2024, 7:00 pm
In Fouda v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 1:47 pm
Skillz Platform Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 1:39 pm
On July 25, 2024, the California Supreme Court ruled in the case of Castellanos v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 11:50 am
It also allows one state to help another in surveillance for any so-called serious crime. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 11:41 am
Nonimmigrants in valid V-1 or V-2/V-3 status or K-3/K-4 status who have an I-485 application pending also do not need advance parole. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 11:40 am
If we look at Naranjo v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 10:29 am
In Ganpat v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 10:00 am
May 14, 2024). [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:59 am
In a ruling regarding the collective complaint Unión General de Trabajadores (UGT) v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:56 am
" On top of dangerous and extreme decisions that overturn settled legal precedents — including Roe v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:20 am
For example in People v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:17 am
In the second case, Panasonic v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 8:24 am
United States. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:07 am
Anderson Undermines State Efforts to Hijack Immigration Enforcement (May 27, 2024) Additional Analysis Readers may also be interested in these pieces published prior to the relevant Supreme Court decisions this term. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:06 am
The case was Trump v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
In contrast, in disciplinary actions pursuant to §75 of the New York State Civil Service Law the courts have held that "the imposition of multiple penalties was improper" as Civil Service Law §75.3 provides for a choice of penalties, thus prohibiting the imposition of more than one of the discrete penalties set out in the statute [see Matteson v City of Oswego, 186 AD2d 1017]. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
In contrast, in disciplinary actions pursuant to §75 of the New York State Civil Service Law the courts have held that "the imposition of multiple penalties was improper" as Civil Service Law §75.3 provides for a choice of penalties, thus prohibiting the imposition of more than one of the discrete penalties set out in the statute [see Matteson v City of Oswego, 186 AD2d 1017]. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Co. v Allied Capital Corp., 35 NY3d 64 and other cases. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Co. v Allied Capital Corp., 35 NY3d 64 and other cases. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Radzierez v. [read post]