Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 701 - 720
of 129,875
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2016, 8:35 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department; HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
p. 2 keep it “totally secret[,] because one day we [may] need to escape the United States. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 5:51 am
State v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:37 pm
See Nevada v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am
On 1 November 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal in R (C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 72, relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 5:19 am
In Young v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 6:39 pm
Since its Apprendi v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:41 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 5:58 am
In order to receive government funding, the state is requiring that such couples be considered. [read post]
4 May 2022, 11:03 am
By Richard Storrow (May 4, 2022) In a widely anticipated move, the United States Supreme Court has voted to overrule Roe v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:35 am
Mann The post Ex-Employee’s Continued Use of Twitter Account May Be Conversion–Farm Journal v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 4:05 am
In Ark Encounter, LLC v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 11:46 am
Case citation: State v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:00 am
This week at SCOTUS: United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 12:20 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:52 am
The post Case Comment: R (Reilly & Anor) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
16 May 2018, 7:42 am
State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am
In support of that conclusion, the court makes this murky statement: “courts in this Circuit have repeatedly held that a plaintiff may state a claim under the Lanham Act where the defendant (1) interfered with the plaintiff’s ability to offer its own commercial services, and/or (2) used the Internet. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 12:33 pm
Blake that a state prisoner wasn't excused from exhausting administrative remedies under the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act because of "special circumstances," but that he may... [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:45 am
On Jan. 11, the Supreme Court hears what may well be the most important case of the term. [read post]
