Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 741 - 760
of 133,155
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2012, 4:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:35 am
Mann The post Ex-Employee’s Continued Use of Twitter Account May Be Conversion–Farm Journal v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
" This amendment established the doctrine of "sovereign immunity" of States and was adopted in response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Chisholm v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
" This amendment established the doctrine of "sovereign immunity" of States and was adopted in response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Chisholm v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 9:15 am
Maureen May contracted Coccidioidomycosis (commonly known as “Cocci” or “Valley Fever”)—a disease caused by the inhalation of Coccidioides spores, a fungus germane to the semi-arid areas of the southwestern states. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 1:16 pm
The district court held that the United States' condemnation extinguished California's public trust on the entire parcel, and that the 27.54 acres which are filled can be conveyed to a private party free of any trust, but that the 4.88 acres that remained tidelands at the time of the taking are now subject to a Federal public trust and may not be conveyed to a private party. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 3:35 am
Wilkins and United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 7:06 am
In Okemgbo v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 1:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 9:23 am
" On May 28, 2009, Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack announced the signing of an interim directive regarding inventoried roadless areas within the National Forests and Grasslands. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 8:09 am
A state-funded charter school in North Carolina may not require female students to wear skirts because it counts as a state actor, the en banc U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 11:46 am
Case citation: State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 5:01 am
Court of Appeals has just made clear in Alphonso Owens v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am
In support of that conclusion, the court makes this murky statement: “courts in this Circuit have repeatedly held that a plaintiff may state a claim under the Lanham Act where the defendant (1) interfered with the plaintiff’s ability to offer its own commercial services, and/or (2) used the Internet. [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:00 am
This week at SCOTUS: United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 6:33 am
State v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 5:51 am
State v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
p. 2 keep it “totally secret[,] because one day we [may] need to escape the United States. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 5:19 am
In Young v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 5:30 am
In WesternGeco LLC v. [read post]
