Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 801 - 820
of 119,194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2025, 3:30 am
As Meredith pointed out in her recent blog on the Executive Order, the SCOTUS held in a New Deal Era case called Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 3:15 am
See Reed, 576 U.S. at 163; AAPC, 591 U.S. at 618 (plurality opinion); United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 9:05 pm
Musk[3] (striking Elon Musk’s $56 billion pay package at Tesla), West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 12:36 pm
” But the Trump Administration may find that using antitrust to curtail “Big Tech censorship” is complicated. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 12:04 pm
[1] On August 20, 2024, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas in Ryan, LLC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 9:36 am
” Michal Barzuza, Nevada v. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 9:07 am
., doing business as L&V Food Supply of Houston, TX, is recalling 1,152 pounds of ineligible peppered frozen, dried Siluriformes fish products that were produced by an establishment in Vietnam that is not eligible to export Siluriformes fish to the United States, according to the U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 9:00 am
In Tash v. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 8:27 am
State UDAPs. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 7:00 am
(Reed v. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 6:34 am
United States 24-571Issues: (1) Whether, under Honeycutt v. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Sadallah v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 160 AD3d 1482, the Appellate Division found that the ALJ's determination was supported by substantial evidence, observing that "Evidence which would not be admissible in a court, such as hearsay, is admissible in a departmental hearing"* and "if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence". [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Sadallah v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 160 AD3d 1482, the Appellate Division found that the ALJ's determination was supported by substantial evidence, observing that "Evidence which would not be admissible in a court, such as hearsay, is admissible in a departmental hearing"* and "if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence". [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 4:05 am
In Foundation for the Advancement of Catholic Schools, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 2:41 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 1:33 am
Such liability may be applied as an overriding mandatory rule irrespective of the lex causae where the foreign company law is applicable. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 12:30 am
However, that power may only be used by the Court of Appeal if it is not already bound by the retained EU case law. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 9:05 pm
Likewise, the 2021 case of Bear Creek Bible Church v. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 9:01 pm
In Maffei v. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 8:05 pm
The second, Walker v. [read post]
