Search for: "Mays v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 127,756
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2019, 8:27 am by Erin Scharff
The post Argument analysis: Court worries that state trust tax may tax trust income that is never distributed to in-state beneficiary appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
28 May 2008, 1:15 am
Regina (G) v Nottingham Healthcare NHS Trust; Regina (N) v Secretary of State for Health; Regina (B) v Nottingham Healthcare NHS Trust Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “Preventing detained mental patients from smoking was not a breach of article 8, right to respect for private and family life, or article 14, prohibiting discrimination, of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
22 May 2008, 4:43 am
R (G) v Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust [2008] EWHC 1096 (Admin); R (N) v Secretary of State for Health; R (B) v Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust; [2008] WLR (D) 162 “A provision which had the effect of prohibiting smoking in a high security psychiatric hospital was not incompatible with the human rights of detained mental patients and was not unlawful. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 6:45 am by MBettman
On May 31, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio was to hear oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 5:55 am by appealattorneylaw
Criminal defense and criminal appeals lawyers may be interested to know that on October 30, 2012, the United States Supreme Court will be having OA in the case of Chaidez v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:24 pm
Last Friday, we looked at AFCCA's fascinating opinion in United States v. [read post]
9 May 2015, 1:55 am by Sme
App., May 7, 2015) (federal and state claims arising originally from a dispute over a covenant not to compete, ultimately reduced to claims or intentional interference with economic relations, breach of contract, and attorney's fees)DiscriminationHare v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 5:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Pursley (The University of Toledo College of Law) has posted Penal Deference and Other Oddities in United States V. [read post]
20 May 2008, 1:43 am
Regina (Nasseri) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “A provision which prevented the Secretary of State for the Home Department from considering whether certain listed countries would return asylum seekers in violation of their human rights did not enact an absolute bar, but was limited in scope. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 1:06 pm
The Court decided United States v. [read post]