Search for: "McAdams v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 78
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2010, 8:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, affording the legal malpractice cause of action a liberal construction and according the plaintiff every favorable inference, the complaint does state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see generally Hamoudeh v Mandel, 62 AD3d 948, 949; Maiolini v McAdams & Fallon, P.C., 61 AD3d 644, 645; Malik v Beal, 54 AD3d 910, 911). [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 7:47 am
" The answer according to State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 4:18 am
  "During a deposition, the plaintiff stated that he did not know what had caused him to fall. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 12:35 pm
Neuman, The Extraterritorial Constitution After Boumediene v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:53 am
Justices Patricia Bamattre-Manoukian and Wendy Duffy concurred in People v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 7:51 pm
Autumn Fox and Doug Thompson won today in State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 9:55 pm
Whether it falls under that line of cases will depend on some further facts, as State of Oregon v Rajneeshpuram shows. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:16 am
WhalenIneffective assistance of appellate counsel in re McAdam issueMay 12-Monday-p.m.State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 8:20 am
This sentencing issue involves a fairly new argument (post-McAdam) regarding manufacture sentencing.You may remember that, in State v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:04 pm
[The Rhode Island Supreme Court case cited in the briefs is State of Rhode Island v. [read post]