Search for: "McBride v. McBride" Results 161 - 180 of 363
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
A finding of 100% contributory negligence should never be made: see Part III.G.i. [13] Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (UK), SI 1998/3132, r 44.3(2)(a). [14] Onay v Brown [2009] EWCA Civ 775; Sonmez v Kebabery Wholesale Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1386. [15] Maes Finance Ltd v AL Phillips & Co (1997) The Times, 25 March (Ch D); Lunnun v Singh (1999) The Times, 19 July (CA). [16] See, eg, Pankhurst v White [2006] EWHC 2093 (QB). [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 5:00 am by Will Bland
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit took up the issue in McBride v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 8:54 am
The Fifth Circuit decided such an issue in McBride v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Walter Olson
Related, CPSC finally holds public hearing on magnet sets standard [WLF Legal Pulse] SCOTUS sleeper Bond v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 3:43 pm by James Beard
The Federal Appellate Court for the Fifth Circuit has entered an opinion, McBride et al v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 5:30 am by Donna Ballman
McBride that the jury instruction the majority approved was the "but for" standard. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
 The judge rejected in this regard the contrary conclusion that our Constitutional Court reached in S v Mamabolo. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 3:40 am by Peter Mahler
Both the affidavits and the assertions are contradicted by the operating agreement (Gould v McBride, 36 AD2d 706, 706-707 [1st Dept 1971], affd 29 NY2d 768 [1971] ["Where, as here, the cause of action is based on documentary evidence, the authenticity of which is not disputed, a general denial, without more, will not suffice to raise an issue of fact"]; see also First Interstate Credit Alliance v Sokol, 179 AD2d 583, 584 [1st Dept 1992] [where there were "affidavits . . .… [read post]