Search for: "McCabe v. Matthews" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2018, 6:04 am by William Ford
Matthew Kahn shared the Supreme Court’s per curiam ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 12:16 pm by Stephanie Zable
Grayson Clary summarized the circuit split as to the legality of border searches, focusing on US v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 6:04 am by thejaghunter
On deck: Attainder courts-martial for Navy SEAL Second Class Petty Officers Matthew V. [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 4:43 am by William Ford
Kahn posted the full audio of oral argument in Al-Alwi v. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 5:10 am by William Ford
 Stewart Baker offered a bleaker perspective on McCabe’s departure. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 6:43 am by William Ford
United States or permitted by its ruling in Munaf v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:04 am
Potential Changes to Fund of Funds Arrangements Posted by Thomas Hiller, Brian McCabe, and Edward Baer, Ropes & Gray LLP, on Friday, February 1, 2019 Tags: Exchange-traded funds, Investment advisers, Investment Advisers Act, Investor protection, Risk management, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Section 12(d), Securities regulation The Latest on Proxy Access Posted by Holly J. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 6:06 am
., on Friday, November 23, 2018 Tags: Compensation ratios, Equity-based compensation, Executive Compensation, Firm performance, Management, Ownership, Shareholder value, TSR Retail, Remedies, Resources and Results: Observations From the SEC Enforcement Division 2018 Annual Report Posted by Robin Bergen, Matthew Solomon, and Alexis Collins, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Saturday, November 24, 2018 … [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:16 am by Lev Sugarman
Pildes unpacked the implications of the 1983 INS v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 11:50 am by William Ford
Julia Solomon-Strauss and Stephen Szrom discussed the latest developments in United States v. al-Nashiri. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 1:36 pm by William Ford
Matthew Kahn shared the Supreme Court’s per curiam ruling declaring the U.S. v. [read post]