Search for: "McCain v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 589
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2015, 3:32 pm by Zack Bluestone
Two days later, the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) ruled that it has jurisdiction to hear the Philippines v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 12:38 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
” One farmer told Amnesty researchers that Kurdish forces threatened to tell the United States that his family was Islamic State if he did not leave his home. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Hogan (invalidating same-sex admissions policy), considered her vote in United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 3:49 am by Amy Howe
” At casetext, Leah Litman discusses a recent Eleventh Circuit decision on the retroactivity of the Court’s decision in Johnson v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court case most closely on point is the 1991 ruling in Masson v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:04 pm by Quinta Jurecic
Nevertheless, Senator John McCain (R-AZ)---who supported the bill---stated that Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter has promised him to draft a plan for Guantanamo’s closure. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 1:21 pm by Tara Hofbauer
  Sean also summarized key points from yesterday's decision by the Supreme Court in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Against this body of case law, PCCM pointed to judgments in several other common law jurisdictions, including: Ireland: C&A Modes v C&A (Waterford) Ltd which Lord Neuberger said [39] shows a “misapprehension” of the reasoning in Crazy Horse;  Canada: Orkin Exterminating Co Inc v Pestco Co of Canada Ltd, which was “of no assistance” [40] since the US-based plaintiff had thousands of customers in CanadaNew Zealand: Dominion Rent A Car Ltd… [read post]
12 May 2015, 9:36 am by Tara Hofbauer
” ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Ben discussed the effect that Klayman v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 6:44 am by Dean Freeman
Beyond that, the appealed ruling conflicts with the 1992 Florida Supreme Court decision in McCain v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:28 am by Dean Freeman
The legal standard often applied to determine whether property owners owed a duty of care to passing motorists is that of the foreseeable zone of risk, as established in McCain v. [read post]