Search for: "McCallum v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 67
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2017, 3:26 am by INFORRM
On 24 May 2017 in the case of Mohareb v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 3) [2017] NSWSC 645) McCallum J refused leave to plead a claim against the State on the basis of vicarious liability for a statement of the Attorney-General which was republished in the media. [read post]
28 May 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On 24 May 2017 in the case of Mohareb v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 3) [2017] NSWSC 645) McCallum J refused leave to plead a claim against the State on the basis of vicarious liability for a statement of the Attorney-General which was republished in the media. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Carolan v Fairfax Media (No.7) [2017] NSWSC 351 McCallum J refused to grant a permanent injunction after a successful libel action where there was no threat to repeat the defamatory imputations. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Events 4 April 2017, “The Commonwealth and Challenges to Media Freedom” conference at the Institute of Commonwealth Studies 28 April 2017, “Conference on Freedom of Expression Online,” Nicosia, Filoxenia Conference Centre, Cyprus Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Mohareb v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited [2017] NSWSC 288 McCallum J had to consider a series of pleaded imputations including “The plaintiff is such an… [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Oscar Kazal v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 44 McCallum J struck out a defence of contextual truth and particulars of mitigation. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 5:24 am by INFORRM
” Justice Burns likened the present case to French v Fraser, in which Justice Lucy McCallum referred to the plaintiff as “the target of a senseless vendetta founded in madness”. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The trial in the case of Graeme Cowper v Fairfax Media Publications is continuing before a McCallum J and a NSW Supreme Court jury. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 10:21 am by INFORRM
There has been some judicial support for this principle in Australia, most notably Justice McCallum in Bleyer v Google Inc, but there has also been judicial criticism and resistance. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 16 May 2016 Sir David Eady heard a PTR in the case of Bloor v Beresford. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
On 16 and 17 March 2016, there was a two day hearing in Decoulos v Axel Springer Schweiz AG & ors On 11 March 2016 there was a judgement in the case of Monarch Airlines Ltd v Yaqub. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:54 am by Patricia Salkin
Rockne Cole, Jon Fogarty, and Mark McCallum filed an application to rezone certain property owned by Iowa City. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 5 February 2016 McCallum J gave judgment in the case of Cheikho v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No.4) [2016] NSWSC 29. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:35 am by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 30 November 2015 McCallum J gave judgment in the case of Toben v Nationwide News Pty Ltd; Toben v Mathieson [2015] NSWSC 1784. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
He then stated that it was for this reason self-represented litigants were generally not entitled to costs. [2] 1465778 Ontario Inc. v. 1122077 Ontario Ltd., 2006 CanLII 35819 (ON CA) [3] Dabbs v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:49 am by INFORRM
Cairns faces a charge of perjury after a 2012 libel trial in which he stated that he “never, ever cheated at cricket”. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:19 am by INFORRM
The Keynote speech [pdf] by Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, John Whittingdale MP. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 3:43 am by INFORRM
The article headed “Female teacher quits top Catholic school after claim of sex with boys” stated the teacher concerned was in her late 20s and taught English and drama. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
Well known examples of those who can make such a defence are the proprietors of libraries (Vizetelly v Mudie’s Select Library Limited) and newsvendors (Emmens v Pott [read post]