Search for: "McCann v. McCann, Jr. " Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2008, 3:35 pm
Well, McCann v UK certainly seems to have stirred things up. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 8:20 pm
Thus, argues the Appellant, there is no impartial judicial tribunal for the possession claim other than ensuring the procedure has been followed via JR or County Court (as in Donoghue and McCann in the ECtHR- but these were Art 8 cases) The stumbling block was a Court of Appeal decision on a similar set of procedures in Introductory Tenancies, McLellan v Bracknell Forest Borough Council [2001] EWCA Civ 1510 [2002] QB 1129, which held that Art 6 was engaged, but the… [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
In view of McCann, he is even more concerned about the separation of HRA and JR grounds [para 116]. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:19 pm
As many people have already emailed me to tell me (alright, four people, all of them lovely), McCann v United Kingdom 19009/04 was handed down today. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 4:20 pm
The High Court considered Connors v UK and McCann v UK on the lack of procedural safeguard. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:36 pm
If it isn’t, then how on earth can the UK contend that domestic law ever complies with the procedural safeguards required in McCann v UK and Cosic v Croatia? [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 7:06 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Champion, Jr., The Second Circuit takes a second look at the non-statutory labor exemption in professional sports: a review of Wood v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 2:48 pm
I don’t think that this one ends the JR and ground 8 possibilities. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 2:48 pm
I don’t think that this one ends the JR and ground 8 possibilities. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
The ECHR in McCann v UK (see our notes here and here) preferred Lord Bingham's approach. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
The ECHR in McCann v UK (see our notes here and here) preferred Lord Bingham's approach. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am by Dave
Manchester CC v Cochrane [1999] 1 WLR 809 and R(McLellan) v Bracknell Forest BC [2001] EWCA Civ 1510 stand in the way of the alternative construction argued for the occupiers (ie that they could bring their gateway (b) defence in the county court, rather than by commencing a fresh JR application). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am by Dave
Manchester CC v Cochrane [1999] 1 WLR 809 and R(McLellan) v Bracknell Forest BC [2001] EWCA Civ 1510 stand in the way of the alternative construction argued for the occupiers (ie that they could bring their gateway (b) defence in the county court, rather than by commencing a fresh JR application). [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 4:30 pm by Mark Beese
Coulter, Vice President and Chair, Client Development and Growth Practice, Hildebrandt José Cunningham, Chief Marketing Officer, Crowell & Moring LLP Beth Cuzzone, Director of Business Development, Goulston & Storrs Patrick V. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 11:47 pm
Foster was convicted for the 1996 murder of Michael LaHood Jr., who was shot following a string of robberies, by a man named Mauriceo Brown. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 2:26 am
Supreme Court has indeed ruled on laws of this nature, drawing the conclusion that you cite above in the 1982 Enmund v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]