Search for: "McCarthy v. McCarthy" Results 61 - 80 of 1,298
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Kevin McCarthy was ousted as speaker, unable to consider any legislation to aid Israel in its war against Hamas or pass any appropriation bills to avoid a potential government shutdown. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 1:17 pm by jeffreynewmanadmin
  The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Payam Danialypour, Oreste McClung, and Frank Goodrich and was supervised by Kimberly Frederick, Brendan McGlynn, Nikolay V. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
., on Wednesday, August 30, 2023 Tags: Delaware articles, Delaware cases, Delaware Court of Chancery, Delaware law, Shareholder meetings, stock splits Disgorgement Accounting After Liu v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
., on Wednesday, August 30, 2023 Tags: Delaware articles, Delaware cases, Delaware Court of Chancery, Delaware law, Shareholder meetings, stock splits Disgorgement Accounting After Liu v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:06 am by Jeffrey Sonnenfeld
Citing the Supreme Court opinion in McCulloch v Maryland (1819) where our first Chief Justice John Marshall’s endorsement of the Constitution as a document intended to be read, understood, and applied by NON-lawyers, Luttig and Tribe, along with my colleague Anjani Jain of Yale encouraged me to author this essay. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 3:42 pm by Ilya Somin
In the process, they clear up some notable misunderstandings, particularly claims—advanced by the editors of National Review and conservative legal commentator Andrew McCarthy—that the definition of "fraud" under federal law isn't broad enough to cover Trump's actions. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 5:13 am
TTABlogger comment: Hat tip to my Wolf Greenfield colleagues, Norm Zivin and Kira-Khanh McCarthy, for this victory. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 5:53 am
The Supreme Court, however, ruled that the Ninth Circuit was wrong in concluding that the toy was entitled to First Amendment protection under Rogers v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:15 am by Eric Columbus
As Andy McCarthy put it in The National Review,  If lawmakers intended the PRA to modify the Espionage Act such that presidents were immune from the latter, they would have said so. [read post]