Search for: "McCarthy v. McCarthy" Results 121 - 140 of 1,294
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2022, 6:02 am by Kevin Schmidt
FOIA Ruling Yields New Argument For Challenging ExemptionBy John McCarthy, Anuj Vohra, and Dan Wolff, Law360, Sept. 14, 2022Last month, in Seife v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:06 am by Albert W. Alschuler
The Justice Department’s current investigation of criminal efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election apparently is taking two paths. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 6:01 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
The result of McCarthy’s strategic blunder is a committee whose Democratic and Republican members alike are in deep, fundamental agreement over the panel’s goals. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Miller, Patel, and McCarthy have been viewed as crucial witnesses for understanding government’s response to the assault and former President Trump’s reaction to the breach. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2022-07-16 https://t.co/70FXxbiZuy 2022-07-17 Supreme Court of Canada confirms all acts of making available are covered by Copyright Act: SOCAN v ESA https://t.co/mipPPJbzRw 2022-07-18 Supreme Court of Canada confirms all acts of making available are covered by Copyright Act: SOCAN v ESA | McCarthy… https://t.co/oUc4VEPxUZ 2022-07-18 National – One royalty, not two https://t.co/lYFHxbQqff 2022-07-18… [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
And, in Dunnes Stores v Ryan [2002] IEHC 61 (5 June 2002), Kearns J in the High Court struck down section 19(6) of the Companies Act, 1990 (also here), which required a company to provide an explanation or make a statement to an officer making inquiries about the company, on the grounds, inter alia, that it infringed the right to silence implied into Article 40.6.1(i) (a right now being relocated to Article 38.1 of the Constitution insofar as it relates to… [read post]