Search for: "McClellan v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 96
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
Like its federal counterpart, Mississippi Rule of Evidence 609 provides, inter alia, that a criminal defendant can be impeached through his prior felony convictions not involving dishonesty or false statement if their probative value outweighs their prejudicial effect. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am
McClellan, 12-1480 (asking whether dismissal “for lack of merit in the grounds presented” is adjudication on the merits), and Unger v. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 5:13 pm
Vázquez will focus on developments in the United States, including such recent decisions as Mallory v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 11:29 pm
Unless McClellan had a massive change in thinking by the year 1887 (and Bell ought to provide a citation for that), one observes that Bell's use of the Miller text is misleading in mentioning ONE of McClellan's theories, but not the other.Bell stated: "By failing to acknowledge Miller's testimony, Carhart misses a persuasive ally. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:51 am
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 1:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2007, 1:52 pm
See, e.g., McClellan, 165 F.3d at 546; United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 6:47 am
McClellan v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 1:45 pm
Virginia’s General Assembly passed a bill that repealed many of the State’s restrictions on abortion on Wednesday. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 3:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:15 am
McClellan, No. 12-1480. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 10:48 pm
See McClellan Fed. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:32 pm
Merck Frosst Canada Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 6:24 am
Co. v McClellan, 127 AD2d at 770). [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 5:34 pm
A more plausible candidate for the international title might be Sydney, capital of the Australian State of New South Wales. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 1:32 am
McClellan. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 8:29 am
Young, 13-95, the state-on-top habeas case asking whether (1) a state can forfeit application of the Stone v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Although the Court did not explicitly overrule Grutter v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am
McClellan, 12-1480 (whether dismissal “for lack of merit in the grounds presented” is adjudication on the merits), and Unger v. [read post]
