Search for: "McConnell v State" Results 181 - 200 of 775
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2020, 11:29 am by Patricia Hughes
However, it was also the rule of law that advanced religious freedom in Canada (in the 1959 Supreme Court of Canada decision in Roncarelli v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 12:01 pm by Robert Black
So far, McConnell has not publicly commented on the amendment-deadline resolution’s progress in the Senate. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Sarah Vowell weighs in on Espinoza v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 7:34 am by Zoe Gujral
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has indicated that he will not support it. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
[Eric Baxter on Ricks v. [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 1:59 pm by Jacob Schulz
And Hannah Kris shared Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s proposed rules for the trial. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
“A federal judge has ordered the nation’s leading pharmacy chains to turn over billions of nationwide prescription records going back 14 years – even as the American Civil Liberties Union and some states attack similar requests by the government as overbroad and an invasion of privacy. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm by Hilary Hurd
” Even staying on the bench when one’s state secedes from the Union. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 5:00 am by Bob Bauer
The House action was “purely partisan,” he stated, and a “partisan crusade. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:41 am by Jonathan Shaub
But McConnell’s desired process would implicitly make an important concession about the evidence against the president. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:34 am by Marty Lederman
  And yesterday, the States and the House filed their reply briefs on the motion to expedite. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 8:18 am by Frank Bowman
Article I, Section 3 of the Constitution says: “The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 5:46 am by Philip Bobbitt
There is a unanimous Supreme Court case on point—United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 7:04 am by Scott R. Anderson, Margaret Taylor
As such, it would fall under a separate set of provisions and related expedited procedures under the War Powers Resolution—provisions widely believed to be unconstitutional following the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:41 pm by David Super
”  With the Senate sitting as a court of impeachment, taking this oath in his current state of mind could place him in a precariousposition. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
City of Chicago (2010), which applied the Second Amendment to the states. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 3:00 pm by Josh Blackman
(A reporter I spoke with confirmed this understanding with Leader McConnell's office.) [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 1:26 pm by William L. Anderson, Esq.
  Mitch McConnell Meets with Pot Execs In California, Pitched Need for Cannabis Banking Reform, Market Watch, October 12, 2019. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 1:26 pm by William L. Anderson, Esq.
  Mitch McConnell Meets with Pot Execs In California, Pitched Need for Cannabis Banking Reform, Market Watch, October 12, 2019. [read post]