Search for: "McConnell v State" Results 181 - 200 of 701
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by JB
Lash has a sixty-page selection of post-ratification materials, including, for example, The Slaughter-House Cases and United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
” Professor Avins and the Commission were convinced that Brown v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 9:03 pm by Katelynn Catalano
White House press secretary Jen Psaki affirmed President Biden’s commitment to codifying Roe v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:34 pm by Tom Smith
Thanks to the Trump White House and Mitch McConnell’s Senate, there is now a 6-to-3 conservative majority on the Supreme Court, vetted by conservative legal activists and committed to principles of constitutional interpretation that seem to require sweeping Roe v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm by Dean Falvy
Harris’ tie-breaking vote) could decide this question for itself, and rely on the Nixon v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:07 am by Eric Goldman
McConnell drafted a bill that included a $2k stimulus check and a repeal of Section 230, but it never got a vote. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Not content with those spoils, Mitch McConnell and the GOP-controlled Senate have played hardball to gain still further advantage. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Daniel B. Edelman
Constitution, including most notably the Equal Protection Clause.As noted in Bush v Gore, a state’s determination shall be “conclusive” only if made pursuant to a law “made prior to election day” by which the “state legislature has provided for final determination of contests or controversies . . . . [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 2:19 pm by Marty Lederman
  If one treated Chief Justice Roberts' opinion in NFIB v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
At that point, the culture war over same-sex marriage had begun in earnest: Goodridge v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 2:52 pm by Amy Howe
And with the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Sept. 18, there were only eight justices participating in the oral argument in Carney v. [read post]