Search for: "McConnell v State"
Results 221 - 240
of 818
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2020, 6:01 am
Texas (2003), McConnell v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Texas (2003), McConnell v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 10:29 am
People v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 4:52 pm
IndiaAshutosh Dubey v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Why, in particular, take this stand when it is so obvious that the red states are not the models of perseverance and virtue that McConnell pretends them to be? [read post]
14 May 2020, 4:04 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 10:42 am
(Lyng v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:01 pm
This appears to be why Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell reconvened the Senate on May 4, despite Monahan’s warnings. [read post]
5 May 2020, 11:51 am
The subcommittee staff’s analysis of the constitutionality of remote voting and participation focused heavily on whether a proposed change to the Senate’s rules, or the adoption of a new rule, would comply with the three-part test the Supreme Court established in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:17 am
“McConnell Demands Liability Protections in Next Coronavirus Bill” [Steven T. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:55 pm
Here’s what will work,” John Bellinger, Washington Post op-ed, 4/23/20 “Congress hands Obama first veto override,” Politico, 9/28/16 MCCONNELL STATE BANKRUPTCY COMMENTS Clip: Mitch McConnell expresses support for allowing states to go bankrupt, Hugh Hewitt radio show, 4/22/20 “McConnell takes flak after suggesting bankruptcy for states rather than bailouts,” Washington Post, 4/23/20 SUPREME COURT Ramos… [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 12:35 pm
I then use this context to critique prominent optimistic originalist accounts, including those presented by Michael McConnell and Steven Calabresi, of the Fourteenth Amendment in Part III. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
See Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 19–21. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
The timing of when the Senate will act on Ratcliffe’s nomination is entirely up to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who could choose—or be persuaded by the president—to sit on the nomination. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 7:55 am
She says that Brown v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:29 am
However, it was also the rule of law that advanced religious freedom in Canada (in the 1959 Supreme Court of Canada decision in Roncarelli v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 12:01 pm
So far, McConnell has not publicly commented on the amendment-deadline resolution’s progress in the Senate. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 3:40 am
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Sarah Vowell weighs in on Espinoza v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 7:34 am
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has indicated that he will not support it. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 3:05 am
[Eric Baxter on Ricks v. [read post]
