Search for: "McConnell v State"
Results 261 - 280
of 733
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2019, 3:02 am
” [Keith Whittington; Vox mini-symposium with Ilya Somin and others] Mike McConnell vs. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
Nixon doubled down on the Southern Strategy during the general election, capturing six southern states compared to one for Democrat Hubert Humphrey. [read post]
7 May 2019, 3:45 am
” Sussman v. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
Germany, Jr. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
One of the great scandals of “the list” compiled by Leo and his associates from which Trump has apparently drawn his nominees for the Supreme Court is that it did not include the widely admired (by liberals) Sixth Circuit Judge Jeffrey Sutton or former Tenth Circuit Judge (and professor at Stanford) Michael McConnell. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:41 am
What if Mitch McConnell gave Obama's Supreme Court choice, Merrick Garland, an up-and-down vote? [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
” United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
” United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 7:29 am
, Shelby County v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:14 am
Claiborne Hardware Co. or Rumsfeld v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 9:00 am
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell even used a hemp pen for his signature. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 7:18 am
Fed’n of State, Cnty., & Mun. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
Because Democrats have passed laws in some states to protect the status quo, should the Supreme Court—freshly packed by Republicans with extreme ideologues—turn the question of abortion rights back to the states by overturning Roe v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 10:55 am
After INS v. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
To state the obvious, no emergency exists. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 9:51 am
Nixon, United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 6:59 pm
In the 1871 case of United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm
There is an abundant historical record supporting the conclusion that the United States Constitution was promoted by a core group of political leaders in order to strengthen the national government, and that the Constitution was understood by the people during the ratification debate to do just that. [read post]
