Search for: "McConnell v State"
Results 301 - 320
of 819
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2019, 10:55 am
After INS v. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
To state the obvious, no emergency exists. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 9:51 am
Nixon, United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 6:59 pm
In the 1871 case of United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm
There is an abundant historical record supporting the conclusion that the United States Constitution was promoted by a core group of political leaders in order to strengthen the national government, and that the Constitution was understood by the people during the ratification debate to do just that. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 11:05 am
As of today, a federal judge and the President of the United States support the result in Texas v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 12:13 pm
Separation of church and state — rightly understood — is vital. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 11:37 pm
McConnell v Commissioner, TC Memo. 1979-247. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 11:11 am
Michigan Chamber of Commerce and portions of McConnell v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 4:32 am
A contract violating Section 4 78 is illegal “and under our settled rules [New York courts] refuse to aid in it but leave the parties where they are” (Spivak, 16 NY2d at 168, citing McConnell v Commonwealth Pictures Corp., 7 NY2d 465 [1960]; see also El Gamayel v Seaman, 72 NY2d 701, 705 [1988] [“As a matter of public policy, a contract to provide services in violation of [Judiciary Law§ 478] is unenforceable in our state… [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 1:31 pm
, Bush v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 5:36 am
See Rath v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:15 pm
But why do such figures, whether in the United States or other democracies, rarely get close to the highest levels of power? [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 4:49 pm
California’s enactment of this privacy legislation raises the question whether other states will follow suit. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 4:49 pm
California’s enactment of this privacy legislation raises the question whether other states will follow suit. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 7:55 am
Looking ahead to October Term 2018, Ian Millhiser of ThinkProgress writes that any one of 13 cases currently pending before or recently decided by a federal court of appeals “could offer the Court’s conservatives a vehicle to overrule Roe v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 2:11 pm
These data can be parsed somewhat differently when senators are separated by state. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:47 am
Immediately after Kennedy’s retirement, Schumer tried to pressure McConnell to honor the so-called “McConnell Rule. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:59 am
In a CNN interview after Justice Anthony Kennedy’s retirement, Collins told Jake Tapper that she “would not support a nominee who demonstrated hostility to Roe v. [read post]
