Search for: "McConnell v State"
Results 341 - 360
of 819
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm
Michael William McConnell of Kirkland & Ellis LLP, arguing on behalf of plaintiffs-appellees Bard and Goldfarb, won an affirmance of a District of Arizona finding of willfulnessin patent infringement. [ BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 5:48 pm
Michigan Chamber of Commerce, 494 U.S. 652 (1990), and the part of McConnell v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:02 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 10:42 am
(Lyng v. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 8:48 am
Under originalism, Brown v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:20 am
As Justice Stephen Breyer pointed out in dissent, there is no way to square the Court’s blessing of multi-million-dollar checks being passed to a senior leader of Congress for later disbursal with the Court’s holding in McConnell v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 4:45 am
In McLane v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 7:59 am
“For any state that passes a law that violates the Constitution, and in particular Roe v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:55 am
Not to step on McConnell, who will be looking at Gianvito v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 5:00 am
., Applicants v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:31 pm
Just consider the shellacking the OSG took in United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 3:20 am
Notably, Judge McConnell was one of the dissenters. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:07 pm
Among other things, it explains why the mandate runs afoul of the five part test established in the Supreme Court’s most recent Necessary and Proper Clause decision, United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:47 am
Supreme Court ruling, in the landmark case of Massachusetts v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:21 pm
McConnell, 962 A.2d 1227 (Pa. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:21 pm
McConnell, 962 A.2d 1227 (Pa. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm
And they'd be especially devastating for states like Kentucky and other coal states. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 4:15 am
” At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, Michael McConnell weighs in on the recent decision in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
In defending McCain-Feingold in the courts, reformers had argued vociferously that these “issue ads” were no different in effect from the “express advocacy” ads the Citizens United Court ruled corporations have a right to make, and the Court had expressly adopted that view in McConnell v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 1:45 pm
NSA, and Jewel v. [read post]
