Search for: "McConnell v State"
Results 341 - 360
of 781
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2017, 8:07 pm
” The Post also pointed out that Mitch McConnell has yet to chime in. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 4:30 pm
… This is the most recent and most egregious example of one side of a split among the states’ highest courts over how to interpret the “neutral principles” approach of Jones v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 5:24 am
The case is styled Secretary of State v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:57 am
United States ex rel Rigsby, which involves the effect on a lawsuit under the False Claims Act of a violation of the act’s seal requirement, and Lynch v. [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 12:18 pm
The Trump/Ryan/McConnell approach to health care will leave Obamacare in the dustbin of history. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 5:40 pm
Majority Leader McConnell said last week: “nobody really focused on the potential downsides in terms of our international relationships. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
McConnell, Mark E. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 11:12 am
” And in McConnell v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:22 am
” In Prawfsblog, Jack Preis discusses Manuel v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
In Bartos v Scottish Legal Complaints Commission 2015 SC 690, at its own instance the court raised a question as to the proper approach to certain provisions in the Legal Profession and Legal Aid (Scotland) Act 2007 (the Act). [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 8:13 am
Trump as a dangerously unstable figure and a friend of foreign despots like Vladimir V. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm
Consider, for example, Riggs v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
(In some cases, like United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 1:03 pm
In 2003, the Supreme Court voted five to four in McConnell v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 8:22 am
Bush in Bush v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 6:02 am
Bush in Bush v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm
Writing for the Brookings Institution, Lisa V. [read post]
19 May 2016, 4:06 am
Commentary on Monday’s decision in Spokeo v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 10:24 am
Scott Applewhite/Associated Press) I asked Stanford law professor Michael McConnell — in my view, one of the two top Religion Clauses scholars in the country — for his thoughts about yesterday’s Zubik v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 5:08 am
The National Immigration Law Center has an explainer on United States v. [read post]
