Search for: "McConnell v State" Results 361 - 380 of 819
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2017, 10:25 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky and Mark J. Levin
A group of 19 state attorneys general and the District of Columbia attorney general have sent a letter to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer expressing the AGs’ “strong opposition” to S.J. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:05 am by Bob Bauer
They had come to a rueful admiration of Justice Scalia’s lone dissent from the Supreme Court’s decision, Morrison v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 11:44 am by Randy Barnett
Chase believed the 14th Amendment barred such discrimination by a state. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
” At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, Michael McConnell weighs in on the recent decision in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 3:09 am by Scott Bomboy
On September 8, 2003, the Court also held a special sitting to hear a predecessor case, McConnell v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 8:04 am by Will Baude
The book I joined — “The Constitution of the United States,” by Michael Stokes Paulsen, Steven Calabresi, Michael McConnell and Samuel Bray — had already been through two editions. [read post]
4 May 2017, 5:45 pm by Sandy Levinson
The most important single Supreme Court opinion in our history is undoubtedly that written by John Marshall in McCulloch v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
”Although House Republicans voted to replace Paul Ryan as Speaker of the House, the new leadership immediately jumped on McConnell’s bandwagon. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Jost on Justice, Ken Jost discusses Turner v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:18 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Hernández v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:30 am by Jordan Brunner
According to one source, Palestinians present at the meeting heard reassuring messages about the two-state solution. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
” At Casetext, David Boyle argues that current events show “that this may not be a good time for the Supreme Court in Lee v. [read post]