Search for: "McConnell v State"
Results 41 - 60
of 756
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2022, 2:08 pm
(AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta) If, as seems likely, the Supreme Court overrules Roe v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 2:36 pm
The case, Noel Canning v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 1:09 pm
During my panel at the conference on the Presidency and the Supreme Court earlier today, Judge Michael McConnell took the position that Roe v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:55 pm
Here’s what will work,” John Bellinger, Washington Post op-ed, 4/23/20 “Congress hands Obama first veto override,” Politico, 9/28/16 MCCONNELL STATE BANKRUPTCY COMMENTS Clip: Mitch McConnell expresses support for allowing states to go bankrupt, Hugh Hewitt radio show, 4/22/20 “McConnell takes flak after suggesting bankruptcy for states rather than bailouts,” Washington Post, 4/23/20 SUPREME COURT Ramos… [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 6:32 am
This being a blog, I will also link to a recent piece of mine on institutional actors in New York Times v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 7:56 am
â€Â  McConnell v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 8:29 pm
Madison, Justice Joseph Story in his Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, and the modern Supreme Court in Edmond v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 6:04 pm
I represented the lead defendant in State v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 10:25 am
A group of 19 state attorneys general and the District of Columbia attorney general have sent a letter to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer expressing the AGs’ “strong opposition” to S.J. [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:17 am
“McConnell Demands Liability Protections in Next Coronavirus Bill” [Steven T. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 11:46 am
As the Supreme Court recently recognized in Arizona v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 11:28 am
The Supreme Court in 2003 upheld the BCRA’s limitations against a facial attack — a claim that a statute is unconstitutional in all of its possible applications — in McConnell v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 3:13 pm
Farms, Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
McConnell concludes: The Supreme Court observed in Buckley v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 1:44 pm
The column is notionally on the McConnell-Grimes Senate race in Kentucky, but the subtext is brought to the fore in the conclusion: The backdrop of this election is a profound gloom about the state of our continuing national experiment in self-government. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:30 pm
And the nature of the business conducted at those ordinary sessions — whether, for example, Senators must vote on nominations, or may return to their home States to meet with their constituents — is a matter for the Senate to decide. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:55 pm
Steve Calabresi and Julia Rickert's new article, Originalism and Sex Discrimination, attempts to do for the 1970s sex equality decisions what Michael McConnell's 1995 article, "Originalism and the Desegregation Decisions," did for Brown v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 5:00 am
The House action was “purely partisan,” he stated, and a “partisan crusade. [read post]
21 May 2015, 1:00 pm
In the wake of ACLU v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 10:09 am
" and so forth, and you may build a compelling case.Polygraph evidence is generally not admissible in court, although in United States v. [read post]
