Search for: "McConnell v State" Results 81 - 100 of 799
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2016, 10:24 am by Eugene Volokh
Scott Applewhite/Associated Press) I asked Stanford law professor Michael McConnell — in my view, one of the two top Religion Clauses scholars in the country — for his thoughts about yesterday’s Zubik v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Pastor McConnell gave evidence as to his background and stated he became a Christian at the age of 8 and had been a full time preacher for 60 years. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 5:40 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: Michael Kirkland of UPI discusses last week’s order granting Senator Mitch McConnell’s motion to share in the argument time in NLRB v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm by Marty Lederman
 (When it later moved the INS from the Department of Justice to DHS, Congress transferred this and other authorities from the Attorney General to the DHS Secretary.)When the Texas v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 8:52 am by WIMS
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chairman Jim Inhofe (R-OK), House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI.) and House Energy and Power Subcommittee Chairman Ed Whitfield (R-KY), 34 Senators and 171 House Members filed an amicus brief today in the case of State of West Virginia, et al. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 1:33 pm
Nonetheless, since Justice Chin exressly concurred in Aguilar to argue that the majority decision overruled Alternative Systems, and since Justice McConnell's opinon states flatly that Justice Chin was wrong, it's still pretty bold.Justice McConnell's holding, by the way, is also fairly important on the merits. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:34 pm by Tom Smith
Thanks to the Trump White House and Mitch McConnell’s Senate, there is now a 6-to-3 conservative majority on the Supreme Court, vetted by conservative legal activists and committed to principles of constitutional interpretation that seem to require sweeping Roe v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 2:49 am by Amy Howe
United States as a case that is “likely to be the Term’s most important federal sentencing case, and its second-most important immigration case after United States v. [read post]