Search for: "McConnell v State"
Results 141 - 160
of 819
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2021, 1:02 am
Under the cover of night, without a single word, the Supreme Court effectively extinguished Roe v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
Ever since Roe v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 2:51 pm
GOP Senate Leader Mitch McConnell called the amendment “unnecessary” and warned that it would give the DOJ and the federal government too much power over the states while Democrats, including Vice President Kamala Harris, applauded the passage of the amendment. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:30 am
At the same time, he was putting pressure on the state’s Secretary of State and on the U.S. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 7:56 am
Suppose Congress passes a law stating that, if the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am
“Sherron, even if it’s the last $10,000 you have, you have to use it to hire an attorney. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
True, originalist scholars sometimes look to post-ratification materials for insight into the original public meaning (McConnell, for instance). [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 10:12 pm
Second, she wrote a concurrence in Fulton v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 4:18 pm
I jumped when California v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Lash has a sixty-page selection of post-ratification materials, including, for example, The Slaughter-House Cases and United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
” Professor Avins and the Commission were convinced that Brown v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 9:03 pm
White House press secretary Jen Psaki affirmed President Biden’s commitment to codifying Roe v. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 2:59 pm
" United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 11:54 pm
Michael McConnell's name was on the cover. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:34 pm
Thanks to the Trump White House and Mitch McConnell’s Senate, there is now a 6-to-3 conservative majority on the Supreme Court, vetted by conservative legal activists and committed to principles of constitutional interpretation that seem to require sweeping Roe v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 7:58 am
Unlike with Trump in the impeachment trial, the First Amendment clearly does apply here, and it has a very high standard for incitement under Brandenburg v. [read post]
27 Feb 2021, 11:30 am
See Johnson v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 8:47 am
In Clinton v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am
In each case, I will state my position briefly; repeat the critique; and where I can, rebut it. [read post]
