Search for: "McCoy v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 390
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2009, 4:34 am
Furthermore, an attorney may be liable for his ignorance of the rules of practice, his failure to comply with conditions precedent to suit, his neglect to prosecute an action, or his failure to conduct adequate legal research (see McCoy v Tepper, 261 AD2d 592 [1999]). [read post]
16 May 2018, 11:21 am
Virginia, McCoy v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 6:34 am
McCoy have published an alert about the United States Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling narrowing the class of would-be whistleblowers under the Dodd-Frank Act. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 8:54 am
In Pryor v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 8:24 am
Sharrock v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 12:18 am
McCoy v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 7:03 am
In Hospadales v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 7:03 am
In Hospadales v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:17 am
Yesterday’s second argument was in McCoy v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 9:39 am
See also McCoy v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 8:41 am
United States (Oklahoma Indian Welfare Act - Trust Funds) McCoy v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:07 pm
At Wednesday’s argument in Chase Bank USA v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 9:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 4:05 am
" In McCoy v Kirsch, NY App. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:02 am
Supreme Court to look to the English roots of the Sixth Amendment and the duties of counsel in other countries today when it considers the case of an American death row inmate” in McCoy v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 12:21 pm
The recent case of Ajamian v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 7:10 am
The first trial resulted in the payment of policy limits plus $1 million in punitive damages (Broussard v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 4:33 am
The facts in McCoy v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 6:15 am
Join for spirited but respectful debate between Professors Chesney and Vladeck as they discuss: The legal basis for a possible presidential action to compel Pfizer to bump the United States ahead of other countries when it comes to accessing vaccine doses beyond the 100 million covered in the current contract Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s attempt to get the Supreme Court to adjudicate a claim by Texas that the election results in Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania all… [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 8:34 am
Robbins (1997), in which the Court deferred to an agency’s interpretation of its own regulation, or was prohibited by the intervening decision in United States v Mead Corporation (2001). [read post]
