Search for: "McDONALD v. STATE" Results 241 - 260 of 1,892
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2011, 2:03 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) CPS v F [2011] EWCA Crim 1844 (21 July 2011) McDonald v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 1776 (21 July 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Rees & Anor v Peters [2011] EWCA Civ 836 (21 July 2011) Finnerty & Anor v Clark & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 858 (21 July 2011) Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council v Norton & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 834 (21 July 2011) Fulham Football Club (1987) Ltd v Richards… [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:24 am by Anna Christensen
The commentary on this week’s oral argument in McDonald v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:40 am by Adam Chandler
Oral Argument in McDonald v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 3:53 pm by Orin Kerr
The Petitioner's Reply Brief in McDonald v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 1:27 pm by WIMS
      On this subject, the majority indicates, ". . .we join the view articulated by the Ninth Circuit in McDonald v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am by DMLP Staff
Swift (Swift & McDonald, PC), Marlo P Cadeddu (Law Office of Marlo P Cadeddu)Court Name: United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas: Dallas DivisionCourt Type: Federal The U.S. government filed three indictments, consisting of seventeen charges, against Barrett Brown, an independent journalist. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am by DMLP Staff
Swift (Swift & McDonald, PC), Marlo P Cadeddu (Law Office of Marlo P Cadeddu)Court Name: United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas: Dallas DivisionCourt Type: Federal The U.S. government filed three indictments, consisting of seventeen charges, against Barrett Brown, an independent journalist. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:38 pm by Jason Mazzone
Heller (2008) and McDonald v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 7:00 am by Kali Borkoski
EMA, Barry McDonald urges the Court to “rethink its approach” to content-based regulations of speech, “allowing state and local governments more latitude to make reasoned determinations that certain types of speech pose a heightened risk of harm. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:01 pm
" Now, after getting out of prison, you had some beers, went to a McDonald's, deliberately hung around the play structure while little kids played, and then grabbed a little girl's crotch and ran away when her father confronted you about it.You claim that it's cruel and unusual punishment to sentence you to life in prison under Washington state's "two strikes" law for child molesters. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
United States v Yancey, 621 F3d 681 (7th Cir 2010) (per curiam) (rejecting Second Amendment challenge to 18 USC § 922(g)(3), which makes it a criminal felony for one who is an unlawful user of, or addicted to, any controlled substance to possess a gun); United States v Seay, 620 F3d 919 (8th Cir 2010), pet. for cert. filed, Dec. 16, 2010 (same) (see also 620 F3d at 924-25, collecting cases); United States v Skoien, 614 F3d 638 (7th Cir 2010)… [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
  The oral argument before the US Supreme Court on Tuesday in McDonald v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 8:03 am by Ashby Jones
From where we sit, the most interesting component of the most interesting Supreme Court case of the term — McDonald v. [read post]