Search for: "McDaniel v. McDaniel" Results 201 - 220 of 268
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2010, 1:55 pm
“DNA evidence remains powerful inculpatory evidence even though the state concedes [its expert] overstated its probative value,” the Supreme Court wrote in McDaniel v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:36 pm
All summaries are produced by Findlaw CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, EVIDENCE, HABEAS CORPUS, PER CURIAM McDaniel v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 9:10 am by Don Cruse
Burrell Day and Joel McDaniel, No. 08-0964 [more info]. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 1:32 pm
“DNA evidence remains powerful inculpatory evidence even though the state concedes [its expert] overstated its probative value,” the Supreme Court wrote in McDaniel v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:40 pm by Tom Goldstein
" All cases that may involve an application of the special rules governing claims brought on habeas corpus are in this category. ------- Title: McDaniel v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 12:54 am
Thanks, Michael Edenborough (Serle Court) and McDaniel & Co for each sending the relevant details. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 3:07 am
Co. of America Subscription Required KINGS COUNTYBusiness Law Fair Value of Shareholder's Interest Comprised Of Fair Value of Corporation, not Apartment Alone McDaniel v. 162 Columbia heights Housing Corp. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 3:00 am
Posts from CrimProf you may have missed over the weekend: Friday Featured Download: Robinson, Cahill & Bartels on Blackmail South Carolina Seeks Crim Law/Evidence Visitor Exum Presents Sentencing Paper at Cincinnati Proposed Federal Cyberbullying Bill Kaye on McDaniel v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:02 am
Kaye (Penn State Dickinson School of Law) has posted 'False But Highly Persuasive:' How Wrong Were the Probability Estimates in McDaniel v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 6:19 am
At Crime and Consequences Blog, Kent Scheidegger recaps a recent Michigan Law Review essay on the DNA testimony at issue in McDaniel v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Opinion below (5th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Docket: 09-63 Title: McDaniel v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 5:28 pm
The Court's unusual action in this regard is noted at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:56 am
  The case of McDaniel v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 6:53 am
In People v McDaniel (54 AD3d 577 [1st Dept 2008]) the First Department divided 3-2 as to whether there was sufficient proof of the display of a weapon to constitute Robbery in the First Degree. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 7:10 am
Smith (08-351), on the right to a court hearing to challenge a forfeiture order for a drug crime; McDaniel v. [read post]