Search for: "McDaniel v. McDaniel" Results 221 - 240 of 260
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2018, 7:06 am by John Elwood
McDaniels, 17-682, a state-on-top case arguing that a woman convicted of third-degree murder did not exhaust her double jeopardy claim as required for collateral review and that the lower court improperly concluded that the double jeopardy clause barred her retrial. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:23 am by Susan Brenner
Starner married Nancy McDaniel sometime in the early 1990's. . . . [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am by John Elwood
McDaniels, 17-682, was dismissed under Supreme Court Rule 46.1 by agreement of the parties. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:27 am by Rick Garnett
” A dozen years earlier, in his concurring opinion in McDaniel v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:09 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals holds in a class-action settlement case that the district court can award attorneys' fees based on the traditional lodestar method rather than the common-fund model.The case is McDaniel v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Issue: Whether under United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:40 pm by Tom Goldstein
" All cases that may involve an application of the special rules governing claims brought on habeas corpus are in this category. ------- Title: McDaniel v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:19 am
McDaniel, Case Western Reserve University, “‘Her house was no longer hers entirely:’ Legal Classification and the Law of Intestacy in Virginia Woolf’s Orlando”Katherine Gilbert, Drury University, “‘There is no private life which has not been determined by a wider public life:’ George Eliot’s Felix Holt (1866)” 10:45-11:00 Break Coffee/Tea SECOND SET OF PANELS 11:00-12:15 Panel 1: Literature, Law and Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure: Roundtable, Rm.630Moderator:… [read post]
11 May 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Judd, “Redistributive taxation in a simple perfect foresight model,” Journal of Public Economics 28 (1985). [2] For recent discussion of the Chamley and Judd results, see Ludwig Straub and Iván Werning,  “Positive Long-Run Capital Taxation: Chamley-Judd Revisited,” American Economic Review 110:1 (2020), and Varadajan V. [read post]