Search for: "McDaniel v. McDaniel" Results 61 - 80 of 269
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2015, 7:15 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
As the court stated in People v McDaniel (1943) 59 CA2d 672, 677: [L]egitimate cross-examination does not extend to matters improperly admitted on direct examination. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:59 am
Moreover, the 1963-90 Free Exercise Clause rules that the RFRAs were meant to restore included protections for elected officials, see McDaniel v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 3:52 am by David DePaolo
Bennett of Rehm, Bennett & Moore, had an interesting observation demonstrating just how fact specific these kind of cases can be.He said if it were his case to try, he would look into whether the hammer Bates used in the assault was a required tool for his job, and "that would be the angle" for saying there was a work-connection.The case was Phillip McDaniel v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 11:16 am
Even before reading the opinion, I saw that it was a published death penalty case with Judge Reinhardt as the author. [read post]
14 May 2015, 1:54 pm by Elizabeth Price Foley
ANTI-DEATH PENALTY DESPERATION:  The Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in a death penalty case out of Oklahoma, Glossip v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 6:43 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At the Appellate Practice Blog of the International Municipal Lawyers Association, Lisa Soronen discusses Green v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 8:49 am
In Haiss v Ball, the offers to settle were Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), Part 36 offers. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:11 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
.‟” In re McDaniel, 293 F.3d 1379, 1385 (Fed. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 7:49 am by boston
Tennessee’s Constitution also bars “ministers of the Gospel” from holding public office – a provision that was struck down by the Supreme Court in the 1978 case McDaniel v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
We focus first on the landmark 1813 case Queen v. [read post]