Search for: "McDonald v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,980
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2010, 3:36 pm
Earlier this year, McDonald v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:40 am
Oral Argument in McDonald v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 3:53 pm
The Petitioner's Reply Brief in McDonald v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:37 am
Among the most anticipated was McDonald v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:38 pm
Heller (2008) and McDonald v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 6:29 am
Here are the materials in State of California v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 7:00 am
EMA, Barry McDonald urges the Court to “rethink its approach” to content-based regulations of speech, “allowing state and local governments more latitude to make reasoned determinations that certain types of speech pose a heightened risk of harm. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:01 pm
" Now, after getting out of prison, you had some beers, went to a McDonald's, deliberately hung around the play structure while little kids played, and then grabbed a little girl's crotch and ran away when her father confronted you about it.You claim that it's cruel and unusual punishment to sentence you to life in prison under Washington state's "two strikes" law for child molesters. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:45 am
The oral argument before the US Supreme Court on Tuesday in McDonald v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 1:27 pm
On this subject, the majority indicates, ". . .we join the view articulated by the Ninth Circuit in McDonald v. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 3:50 pm
McDonald v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm
United States v Yancey, 621 F3d 681 (7th Cir 2010) (per curiam) (rejecting Second Amendment challenge to 18 USC § 922(g)(3), which makes it a criminal felony for one who is an unlawful user of, or addicted to, any controlled substance to possess a gun); United States v Seay, 620 F3d 919 (8th Cir 2010), pet. for cert. filed, Dec. 16, 2010 (same) (see also 620 F3d at 924-25, collecting cases); United States v Skoien, 614 F3d 638 (7th Cir 2010)… [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:38 am
McDonald. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:52 pm
As Jim Lindgren has noted, on the eve of the argument in McDonald v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:42 pm
(See D.C. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:29 am
But, as the Court’s decision in McDonald v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 1:55 pm
The petition in McDonald, et al., v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:11 pm
My argument is that the Jury Trial Clause — as historically understood, and as accepted by the Court in federal cases — requires jury unanimity for a conviction, and that following McDonald v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am
Swift (Swift & McDonald, PC), Marlo P Cadeddu (Law Office of Marlo P Cadeddu)Court Name: United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas: Dallas DivisionCourt Type: Federal The U.S. government filed three indictments, consisting of seventeen charges, against Barrett Brown, an independent journalist. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am
Swift (Swift & McDonald, PC), Marlo P Cadeddu (Law Office of Marlo P Cadeddu)Court Name: United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas: Dallas DivisionCourt Type: Federal The U.S. government filed three indictments, consisting of seventeen charges, against Barrett Brown, an independent journalist. [read post]