Search for: "McDonald v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 1,765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am by Matthew Kahn
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit disagreed, concluding that it was bound by its 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
” (emphasis added) Applying this wisdom to Article 10 which accords to society to right to receive (true) information, Lord Hobhouse states that the working of a democratic depends on society not being misinformed. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:00 am by SHG
Richard Kopf Why CLS proves that Buck v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 7:04 am by Derek T. Muller
”As to the dissenting opinion, it’s worth framing the matter from Supreme Court precedent as Chief Justice Earl Warren did in McDonald v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 5:05 pm
As we head into a hot holiday weekend, here are some appellate items to explore:Today's DJ has Justice Moore's piece on Jackie Robinson, United States v. 2LT Jack R Robinson as well as Marc Alexander's book review: Notorious RBG Talks Life, Love, Liberty, and LawThe Recorder's On Appeals column has Katy Graham's The Far-Reaching Effects of a Landmark Decision on the Standard of Appellate Review for Clear and Convincing Evidence.Tuesday's… [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:59 am by Kristian Soltes
Department of Justice and a contingent of state attorneys general challenged AmEx’s anti-steering rules in a case that reached the Supreme Court in 2018 as Ohio v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 8:29 am by John Jascob
The complaint alleges that had Easterbrook not lied, McDonald’s would have terminated him for cause, and he would not have been entitled to any severance (McDonald’s Corporation v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
McDonald analyzed a previously restricted database maintained by the U.S. [read post]