Search for: "McDonald v. State" Results 421 - 440 of 1,771
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2019, 1:02 pm by Trey Apffel
To read the State Bar’s response and related filings in McDonald v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 1:02 pm by Trey Apffel
To read the State Bar’s response and related filings in McDonald v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Poor evidence costs McDonald’s its BIG MAC in Supermac attackSupermac’s (Holdings) Ltd v McDonald’s Cancellation No 14 788 C, EUIPO (January 2019)Supermac’s and McDonald’s are locked in a variety of MAC burger battles. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 6:20 am
., on Friday, April 5, 2019 Tags: Board composition, Board leadership, Boards of Directors, California, Diversity, Institutional Investors, Institutional voting, Proxy advisors, SB 826, State law, Surveys Review and Analysis of 2018 U.S. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Katfriend Nicoletta Epaminonda takes a loot at the Cypriot transposition of the Trade Mark Directive 2015/2436 and reflects on what the future might hold for trade marks in this Member State. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 12:20 pm by David Markus
On this record, holding that the ban is constitutional as applied to Kanter does not “put[] the government through its paces,” see Williams, 616 F.3d at 692, but instead treats the Second Amendment as a “second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees,” McDonald v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:36 pm
One of the most cited examples is McDonald’s McFailure. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 3:15 pm by Mark Tushnet
His separate opinion in Timbs insists, as did his opinion in McDonald, that the textual location for protection of fundamental rights against violation by state governments lies in the Fourteenth Amendment's "privileges or immunities" clause. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:18 am by SHG
After this holding, and its extension to the states, the Supreme Court went dark on the Second Amendment, leaving circuit courts of appeals to uphold local restrictions and refusing to uphold its Heller and McDonald rulings by denying certiorari. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 11:09 am
"The Court has refused to take up Second Amendment cases since its 2010 ruling in McDonald v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]