Search for: "McDonald v. State"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,974
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
V. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 2:21 pm
As they point out, the Text, History, and Tradition Test is the one used in Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 12:07 pm
Manipoun violated the V Club Reward Program Rules which state that only the registered V Club member can gain entries from her own slot machine play, and whereas, Ms. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 9:49 am
McDonald (4th Cir. 2017) and Hutton vs. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 11:50 pm
Proportionality and section 21 evictions Landlords will be pleased to learn that an appeal of the case McDonald v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 12:59 pm
We saw the case of McDonald v McDonald through the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 9:30 pm
United States Surgical Corporation (1984) Simone Degeling and Greg Weeks13. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 8:09 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 7:34 am
McDonald, 823 F.3d 630, 639 (Fed. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 11:14 am
For instance, the infamous “Hot Coffee” case (formally known as Liebeck v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 9:50 am
(McKenna, 104-105) (quoting Rolex Watch U.S.A. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 10:18 am
Loewy’s article Why Roe v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:35 pm
Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims held, in Haas v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 11:50 am
Heller and reaffirmed this right vis-à-vis state laws in McDonald v. [read post]
