Search for: "McDonald v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 1,532
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2010, 6:29 am by Matt Sundquist
Not surprisingly, coverage of last week’s oral argument in McDonald v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 6:45 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
 2019), the judgment of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:33 pm by Brewster Taylor
In my blog post last week, I promised to write about how a large company with nearly ubiquitous advertising can use claims of dilution to enormous effect, but first, in the context of one case, McDonald’s Corp. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:24 am by Anna Christensen
The commentary on this week’s oral argument in McDonald v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 7:06 pm
Since counsel framed the claim exclusively in therms of the United States Constitution that Copurt applied the federal test for IAC set forth in Strickland v Washington (466 US 668); see People v McDonald, 1 NY3d 109, 114-115).On appeal Ms. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 12:58 am by INFORRM
And now South Australia’s Law Reform Commission has launched an inquiry to whether that state should introduce a statutory right of privacy. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 7:00 am by Kali Borkoski
EMA, Barry McDonald urges the Court to “rethink its approach” to content-based regulations of speech, “allowing state and local governments more latitude to make reasoned determinations that certain types of speech pose a heightened risk of harm.”  [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 6:16 pm by Brewster Taylor
Have you been on the edge of your seats since last week when I promised to write about how a company like McDonald’s Corp. can use the law preventing dilution of a famous mark in the context of the same case I discussed last week, McDonald’s Corp. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 5:47 pm
Contact: Margaret Dooley-Sammuli 213-291-4190 or Tommy McDonald 510-229-5215 WASHINGTON, DC – The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 4:50 am by Lyle Denniston
Thanks to the Second Amendment Foundation, and Alan Gura, counsel for the petitioners in McDonald v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 8:30 am by Richard Goldfarb
  But the allegations about testing of products relate only to McDonald's and Burger King; there is just an allegation that Friendly's "is assumed to be aware of health issues pertinent to restaurants anywhere in the United States" and and even more conclusory, "Upon information and belief, Defendants' grilled chicken products are prepared in the same manner throughout the United States. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 12:03 pm by David Kopel
The circuit issued a joint opinion in two related cases, New York State Rifle & Pistol Assoc. v. [read post]